<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TFS Rosario - Team Build uses Windows Workflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ozgrant.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ozgrant.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/</link>
	<description>An Aussie in Seattle</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://ozgrant.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/#comment-16993</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gholliday.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/#comment-16993</guid>
		<description>It's good to see that they are making a concerted effort in Rosario to enhance UI support for Team Build.  MSBuild is powerful, but isn't half as easy to use as Final Builder or Visual Build Pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see that they are making a concerted effort in Rosario to enhance UI support for Team Build.  MSBuild is powerful, but isn&#8217;t half as easy to use as Final Builder or Visual Build Pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFS Rosario - Automate a manual test &#38; add validation &#171; Grant Holliday</title>
		<link>http://ozgrant.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/#comment-16732</link>
		<dc:creator>TFS Rosario - Automate a manual test &#38; add validation &#171; Grant Holliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gholliday.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/#comment-16732</guid>
		<description>[...] add&#160;validation  In my recent series of TFS Rosario blog posts, I&#8217;ve been looking at all the new features that are available in the April CTP of Visual Studio Team System Codename [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] add&nbsp;validation  In my recent series of TFS Rosario blog posts, I&#8217;ve been looking at all the new features that are available in the April CTP of Visual Studio Team System Codename [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFS Rosario - Team Build uses Windows Workflow &#171; Grant Holliday &#171; Noocyte&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://ozgrant.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/#comment-16724</link>
		<dc:creator>TFS Rosario - Team Build uses Windows Workflow &#171; Grant Holliday &#171; Noocyte&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gholliday.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/#comment-16724</guid>
		<description>[...] TFS Rosario - Team Build uses Windows Workflow « Grant Holliday [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TFS Rosario - Team Build uses Windows Workflow « Grant Holliday [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stovell</title>
		<link>http://ozgrant.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/#comment-16704</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gholliday.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/tfs-rosario-team-build-uses-windows-workflow/#comment-16704</guid>
		<description>I'm disappointed they didn't go the whole way and use BizTalk. Then my build system could be an orchestration, and if I ever wanted to use a different compiler, it would just be a BizTalk Adapter away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m disappointed they didn&#8217;t go the whole way and use BizTalk. Then my build system could be an orchestration, and if I ever wanted to use a different compiler, it would just be a BizTalk Adapter away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
